Nine Statements vs Seven Tenets

A Satanist whose hobby or fetish is Satanism per se, is no more of a Satanist than one who, realizing the indulgence advocated by Satanism, accepts the Name. The difference between the man or woman who’s a practicing Satanist, from an identity Satanist is that the practicing Satanist looks at the picture, while the identity Satanist studies the frame.

Anton LaVey, “The World’s Most Powerful Religion”

I admit it: I think vengeance is stupid.

People are emotional and reactive animals, and when we have been wronged we want to strike back. When we have been hurt, we want to cause hurt, and our instincts have not wired us to judge whether our acts of retribution are in proportion to the harm done to us, or even whether they will backfire and hurt us in the end. An act of vengeance might stop a person from doing harm in the future. It might teach someone a lesson. But you are kidding yourself if you think that the motivation behind vengeance is to make sure people “learn from their misdeeds.” The fire that burns inside you for vengeance is a punisher, not a teacher.

I want to start with that admission, because one of LaVey’s Nine Satanic Statements is: “Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek!” As a result, there are people who might say that I cannot be a true Satanist, on the grounds that I think vengeance is stupid.

But when I reflect on the values and driving motives of Satan, as I understand that mythological and literary character, I simply don’t see vengeance as a driving force. He fought against Yahweh for freedom, not vengeance. He tempted Eve in the garden of Eden out of a desire see humanity freed from the prison of ignorance, not out of some kind of clap-back against God.

LaVey included vengeance as one of the Nine Satanic Statements as a direct inversion of the Christian edict to “turn the other cheek.” I understand the logic behind that, I really do. And I also understand that many people are harmed by that element of Christian moral philosophy: they pour emotional energy into the providing care and attention to people who are not helped by it, and who will never reciprocate it.

But is it any better to pour your energy into hurting them? When you spend your valuable time and energy exacting vengeance on someone, they are controlling you. As a Satanist, I will not give such a person that power over me. I will not forgive, give them “another chance”, or waste my valuable care and kindness on them; however, I will not waste my time and energy punishing them either. Ultimately, by inverting the Christian idea of “turn the other cheek” as “get revenge!” you are still letting bad people control you. You are still pouring your energy into a person who does not deserve your energy.

And for what? In the end, most people like that are too stupid to realize they are being punished. They will see your acts of vengeance and, rather than learning a “lesson” about their own behavior, they will just decide that you are a mean person. And they will carry on as they always have with their dysfunctional lives.

So must I embrace vengeance to be a Satanist?

The Nine Satanic Statements appear in the opening section of The Satanic Bible by Anton LaVey, and are often understood to be core beliefs of Satanists who identify closely with the Church of Satan. More recently, The Satanic Temple has offered the Seven Fundamental Tenets as an expression of the core moral axioms of their interpretation of Satanism.

Two different lists, from two interpretations of Satanism. Some people make much ado over the fact that there are items that can be paired, one from each list, that appear to contradict each other. The fifth Statement (“Satan represents vengeance instead of turning the other cheek!”) and the first Tenet (“One should strive to act with compassion and empathy towards all creatures in accordance with reason.”) is an example of such a pair.

Can both be authentic expressions of Satanism?

LaVey built a detailed and fully-articulated religious philosophy around the inspiration he drew from the literary and mythological character Satan, and codified it into what he called “Satanism.” Moreover, he loved lists. He loved them! He made multiple lists for Satanism. He even made a list for Catism.

The Five Commandments of Catism (according to LaVey) are:


Now let’s pause and think for a moment. Suppose someone had approached LaVey to say this:

My dear Sir, I feel a passionate connection with cats and their life’s modus operandi. I am obsessed with living and breathing a life of Catism, and for me the Three Commandments of Catism are:

  1. Demand all the attention… until you don’t want it anymore.
  2. Change your mind as you will: you need no justification.
  3. If you fits, you sits.

How would LaVey have responded? One cannot know for sure, I suppose; but I have a difficult time picturing LaVey saying: “No, I have codified exactly what Catism is with my list of Five Commandments, and if you want to follow your ridiculous three supposedly-catish commandments, you will just have to call it something else!”

LaVey knew he didn’t invent cats.

Living life as a Satanist means living a life that is guided and inspired by the life and deeds of the fictional archetype known in our culture as Satan. People who fixate on the Nine Statements as the only expression of Satanism are not living their lives as Satanists. They are not practicing Satanism: they are fetishizing Satanism qua Satanism. They have lost track of the picture in their obsession with LaVey’s frame.


  1. Good article, mainly because it should raise thorny issues in the mind of some readers. Obviously, revenge has certain downfalls as described, but there is a third way, which is to discern the level of magnitude a slight against one’s person has experienced, then decide from there whether the effort to repay in kind is worth it, or better left unanswered. There’s that old axiom of ‘Indifference is worse than hate’ (or better) depending on one’s viewpoint. An intelligent person picks their fights wisely as battles always require energy and time, both of which are precious resources.

    Then there’s the position of Statements to follow or Tenets to abide by. I’d argue that all of the above 9 or 7 are interesting guidelines for conduct but silly rules for people who have a tendency to ‘follow’, strict adherents to either side of the Satanic coin are hardly likely show that rebellious Satanic streak if they are so dug in to a mindset that they cannot dream of deviating for fear of straying from the script.

    Having some time and experience to reflect upon Satanic matters, plus observations of various other strains of individuality promoting clubs, there’s always the rank and file who’ll lap up every word and treat it like it’s gospel. If they weren’t all high-fiving 93! / Hail Satan etc, they’d probably easily fall in line with bowing down with a Namaste, or the like.

    For the record, my views are very much in line with what I have learned about TST in my recent crash course, but I’d like to think without all the attention and recent fandom, founding members would encourage individual critical thinking rather than learnt by rote empty slogans of affiliation. I feel that the seven Tenets are perfect for this time and this particular strain of Satanism. I’m reminded of Alan Moore’s beautiful essay on Magick where he takes some brilliant sniper-worthy pot shots at the various magick orders and practically encourages the reader to mentally burn the whole lot down and start again. Perhaps the TST was born in this spirit. I’m not entirely convinced that to label one’s self a Satanist is the right approach, regardless of how closely one feels connection with the aims and ethos, purely for the same reason that If I were an assassin, I wouldn’t necessarily broadcast the fact by wearing a badge or a t-shirt declaring my marksmanship or poisoning skills.

    This of course is another thorny issue, one I struggle with. Groucho Marx was famous for saying “I wouldn’t want to belong to a club that would have someone like me as a member”

    On the other hand, I really do have a soft spot for what this 21st century Devil is up to. The cat analogy is spot on.

  2. That’s an interesting argument you set forth in this article. As a disclaimer, let me say that I’m a very new member of TST so my interpretation might be way off.

    Is there a major difference between LaVey’s intention of the term ‘Vengeance’ versus Greaves term of ‘Justice’? I would think so – I don’t find those two concepts interchangeable but the 9 statements were published in 1969, a very tense social environment.

    If my conflict with someone is mental or emotional, I’d just ignore them till they went away because they will. But if it’s something tangible, say physical or financial, then I’m going for retribution in some manner. I don’t bend the knee for anyone and to me that’s justice. Would you call that vengeance, justice or something else?

    Recently in Cincinnati a guy was arrested on some extreme child pornography charges with some satanic items in the room he performed these acts. I wouldn’t consider him a true satanist but he may have felt entitled by LaVey’s 8th statement.

    So, should some action be taken against him or not? Me, I’m gonna say yes there should and I’d call that justice. Now, if a person thought there shouldn’t be any action taken against him, would they call that vengeance? I think they would.

    Hail Satan!

  3. Like the commentor above, I’m new to TST, so my interpretation may be way off. Having said that, though, I don’t think that it has to be a competition. The desire for vengeance only appears to contradict the seven tenets until one realizes that it can be channelled constructively into the struggle for justice. After all, what is the desire for justice if not a sense of wrath over an injustice?

    1. I absolutely agree that the desire for vengeance can be channeled into a constructed search for justice. But I also know that the desire for vengeance doesn’t inherently seek that goal… it’s a driving emotional force that can be vindictive and can be destructive. As you said: it needs to be “channeled” in order for justice to be the end result.

      That’s why, when I think about what Satanism means to me, I am more drawn to “justice” as an ideal than “vengeance” per se. You are correct that they do have some overlap. But for me, using the idea of “justice” incorporates both the implication of the driving desire to act against people who do wrong and the implication of moderation and thoughtful consideration to ensure that the actions are constructive and achieve the ends you want.

Comments are closed.